For at least a couple months now, I've talked occasionally about getting married to the monkey.
This is an interesting subject for me, and my reasons for it are odd. Actually, I know at least one person who got married for insurance benefits, so I don't think it's that odd. I mean they loved their significant other, but that's what made them sure.
The monkey is on some heavy and expensive medications. She requires regular psychiatric and therapeutic care. It costs me on average a grand a month, (it so does not! It's more like between $600 and $650, not including the gas used driving to appointments and whatnot) out of pocket, and we MAY not see it back, as the insurance was rather confusing. My therapist was assured that we will get almost all of it back.
And (dark a thought that it may be) she's had some heavy self-injury issues years ago that could be a disaster if they ever surfaced again. Love, that would be a disaster in my life whether I were with you or not. Also, we play in some pretty heavy things, and one ER visit that gets deemed "
Right now, she's insured on some student terms that are, IMHO, pretty shaky as she's positioned to graduate soon, and she's also living in a different state from that she's a student of (and is still using her home address to get them). I'm also insured under my step-father's job. Which is actually really good insurance.
My job's rather-good insurance will cover her, but only as a wife. A job I could have taken in California would have covered her as a domestic partner, having only to share an address, sign a piece of paper, open a joint bank account, co-own a car, or any other amount of similar things, to get the whole deal.
The monkey, as many know, identifies as genderqueer, sometimes a boy, sometimes a girl...and is a big fan of gay marriage, and the rights therein. Like any person who's not an idiot and/or asshole. For other personal reasons (that I'm sure will be annotated), the monkey is NOT a fan of marrying simply for benefits reasons. It means something to me. It's a religious and legal institution which makes it complicated but it's something I take very seriously. It's not a step I feel ready for at this point in my life.
Myself, being totally non-religious, I see marriage purely as a legal construct. I do not need a piece of paper to tell someone I will love them always, that I wish always to have them in my life. I think that goes without saying, sir. I do not need the approval of either a legal system I have less respect for, which denies people equality -- nor the approval of a religion I do not subscribe to, to say whose hand I hold. Really you hold onto my wrist, not my hand.
(Oddly, I do prefer the strength of a piece of paper as a way of enforcing what I may or may not do to a person; i.e. I have less doubt about punishing the monkey on the clause she has signed a contract for me for, than other behaviors -- but that is simply a contract strictly on our own terms, not subject to the interpretation of a greater legal or religious body.)
I do, however, need a piece of paper to be able to say "I am supporting this person, give me a tax break", or "she's with me, give her healthcare", or "she's on my car insurance", or the quite-extreme "She's not conscious, I'm coming with her, let me in the goddamned ambulance". I've been on both sides of the emergency room doors when they were slammed in people's faces: "Sorry, family only". Boyfriend doesn't cut it. Fiancee doesn't even cut it. I haven't personally tried "I'm her master" but I doubt it would be better.
And yes, for most queer types, marriage is an obstacle. My argument and opinion has always been "at the moment, you're legally male and I'm legally female. Yes, we're sorry our gay friends can't get married, (nevermind that I identify as queer/gay) but if the system doesn't respect us, what's to stop US from milking the system for our convenience?" It feels cheap to me. False. The system sucks, but I don't think that's a reason to use it like the Top is proposing.
So I want the benefits of Marriage, but this too has seemed "off" in the monkey's head, until I made an analogy clear to her. I am adopting her. Taking her in, just like a child. I own her. And in order to do that fully, the marriage may be necessary. It's not the modern, 20th-century "mutual partnership". It's the 19th century "you better love, honor and obey me" role.
And while "Daddy" is a sensitive word that we tread carefully around and that I will never require of her [because of her own issues with her passed-away father, and because a previous, abusive ex required it (he didn't require it)] -- I do want a parental, guardian-like role. I want to be the one who holds her and tells her she's a good girl (or boy). I want to be the one who she cuddles up to and feels warm by. She's the one I want to make sure is well taken care of in my life insurance policy if god-forbid anything happens to me. We laughed about it last night. She can be my Dick Grayson.
I discussed a good portion of the above with a friend and they suggested something alternative: power of attorney.
Virginia, where we currently live, is generally obnoxious about this, to the point where I want the REAL thing. Besides which, I consider Power of Attorney to be a slippery slope: in taking it, it's sometimes more difficult to get back, even when both parties are consenting.
On a psychological, training level, while we've discussed in previous entries that I DO NOT want her body shaved because I like the "twelve year old" look, there IS something about the cleanliness and uniformity of it all: she hasn't "come of age" yet. Not physical age, but simply: that like a child in school, she's not allowed to choose her own clothing, she's not allowed the privilege of getting a job outside the house, she's not allowed most of her own life decisions (although I'll respect academia and religion as personal choices), just as like a child, her "job" is having chores around the house and getting an allowance when her behavior warrants it.
Right now, she's a slavegirl, or my "boy". They're adolescent terms but don't necessarily imply ageplay. "Boy" has long been used in the leather community to designate an inferior, a trainee, an apprentice. Actually, the nickname "boy" was coined for me years ago when a friend says I was fun to play with, like a Ball Of Yarn.
And one day, she may "graduate", and take the world by storm -- be allowed to earn and spend her own money and buy some of her own clothes. -giggle- *That's* taking the world by storm, sir? I would very much like it if one day, she were able to turn her experiences in this into a career as a writer, speaker, or educator, sharing the fact that this can in fact be something loving and caring. And after all that, I'd be honored if she will wear my collar, kneel before me at a word, and when she enters my bed, she will still ask me first.
Hi, I'm the top. And I want to Keep this monkey. Always.